Cases 1 - 10 of 28
Erby v. Aramark
as 2:2024cv02673
Defendant:
Aramark
Plaintiff:
Richard Erby
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Williams et al v. Aramark et al
as 2:2024cv02146
Plaintiff:
Robert E. Williams, Corey D. Lurry and Jamal Moore
Defendant:
Aramark, Shelby County Sheriff Office, Floyd Bonner and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Pitts v. Aramark Food Service et al
as 2:2023cv02137
Plaintiff:
Christian Pitts
Defendant:
Aramark Food Service, Shelby County Sheriff Office, Wellpath Healthcare Provider and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Watkins v. Aramark et al
as 2:2023cv02020
Plaintiff:
Marlo S. Watkins
Defendant:
Aramark, Shirley Hayslett and F/N/U Kesha
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
West v. Helton et al
as 2:2022cv02877
Plaintiff:
Diane West
Defendant:
Lisa Helton, Stanley Dickerson, Kelley Shakera and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Burgess v. Aramark Correctional Services et al
as 1:2018cv01208
Defendant:
Tony Parker, Reeves, Strictland and others
Plaintiff:
Clifford E. Burgess
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Tankesly v. Aramark Correctional Services et al
as 1:2018cv01058
Plaintiff:
Calvin Tankesly
Defendant:
Aramark Correctional Services, Monqie Skowronski, Pam Wright and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Benson v. Oldham et al
as 2:2017cv02749
Plaintiff:
Ricky Benson
Defendant:
William Bill Oldham, Robert Moore, Greenleaf and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Douglas v. Shelby County Jail et al
as 2:2017cv02470
Plaintiff:
Donald Douglas
Defendant:
Shelby County Jail, Bill Oldham and Aramark Food Services
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Shannon v. Luttrell et al
as 2:2017cv02213
Plaintiff:
Wayne Shannon
Defendant:
Mark H. Luttrell, William J. Gupton, Jr., William Spears and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
