Cases 1 - 10 of 17
Ayers v. Buford et al
as 2:2023cv02772
Plaintiff:
Keshawn Ayers
Defendant:
Sgt. Buford, Officer Avalos, Lt. Brown and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Pitts v. Aramark Food Service et al
as 2:2023cv02137
Plaintiff:
Christian Pitts
Defendant:
Aramark Food Service, Shelby County Sheriff Office, Wellpath Healthcare Provider and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ashley v. Genovese et al
as 1:2020cv01275
Defendant:
Kevin Genovese, John Doe #1, Gary Holder and others
Plaintiff:
Timothy Ashley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Shotwell v. Drewery et al
as 2:2019cv02751
Defendant:
Kersey, Phil Drewery, Jr., Jason Drewery and others
Plaintiff:
Roy Shotwell, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dunn v. Parker et al
as 1:2019cv01080
Defendant:
Jennifer Williams, Arvil Chapman, Jane Doe 3 and others
Plaintiff:
Joshua Dunn
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Keller v. Batts et al
as 2:2018cv02818
Defendant:
F/N/U Jacobs, Ann Simon, Victoria Buzzanga and others
Plaintiff:
Charles Derrick Keller
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Duckett v. Parrish et al
as 1:2017cv01185
Plaintiff:
Ronald L. Duckett
Defendant:
Micheal Parris, Shane Adcock, Pettie and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Greene v. Gaylor et al
as 2:2015cv02209
Plaintiff:
William Demarcus Greene
Defendant:
James Gaylor, Ofc: John Doe #1 and Ofc: John Doe #2
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Green v. Jones et al
as 2:2014cv02306
Plaintiff:
Marvin Green
Defendant:
Brenda Jones, Baynes, Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Keller v. City of Memphis, Tennessee, Memphis Police Department's Organized Crime Unit et al
as 2:2013cv02166
Plaintiff:
Curtis Keller
Defendant:
City of Memphis, Tennessee, Memphis Police Department's Organized Crime Unit, Officer John Doe #1, Officer John Doe #2 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
