Cases 1 - 10 of 36
Pearson v. Attorney General of the State of Tennessee
as 2:2022cv02202
Petitioner:
Harry W. Pearson
Respondent:
Attorney General of the State of Tennessee and Martin Frink
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Pearson v. Frink
as 2:2021cv02752
Petitioner:
Harry W. Pearson
Respondent:
Warden Martin Frink
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Pearson v. Shelby County Division Correction et al
as 2:2019cv02278
Defendant:
Thomas Young, Shelby County Division Correction, Reese Walker and others
Plaintiff:
Melvin Pearson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Crowe v. Pounders et al
as 2:2018cv02885
Defendant:
AWO Jones, Nurse Practitioners (2), Core Civic and others
Plaintiff:
Douglas Neal Crowe, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gary et al v. Shelby County Government et al
as 2:2018cv02756
Plaintiff:
Ontario Hiler, Paul Pearson, Nicco Spates and others
Defendant:
State of Tennessee, Amy P. Weirich, Floyd Bonner and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Pearson v. State of Tennessee
as 1:2018cv01199
Plaintiff:
Lorenzo Pearson
Defendant:
State of Tennessee
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Pearson v. United States of America
as 1:2017cv01136
Petitioner:
Kevin Bernard Pearson
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Pearson v. Arnold et al
as 1:2013cv01142
Defendant:
Chuck Arnold, Sherry Jo Smith, Jeff Maitland and others
Plaintiff:
Jacoby Pearson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Pearson v. Arnold et al
as 1:2013cv01055
Plaintiff:
Jacoby Pearson
Defendant:
Chuck Arnold, Sherry Jo Smith, Jeff Maitland and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Horton et al v. Arnold et al
as 1:2013cv01032
Plaintiff:
William Horton, Chris Cook, Adonis Bill and others
Defendant:
Chuck Arnold, Sherry Jo Smith, Jeff Maitland and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
