Cases 41 - 50 of 1,257
Cathey v. CITY OF MEMPHIS (MEMPHIS POLICE DEPARTMENT) et al
as 2:2023cv02707
Plaintiff:
Colton Cathey
Defendant:
CITY OF MEMPHIS (MEMPHIS POLICE DEPARTMENT), Cerelyn Davis, John Morris and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Estate of John Paul Mummert, Deceased v. Erin Cassinelli
as 2:2023cv02700
Plaintiff:
Estate of John Paul Mumert, Deceased and Estate of John Paul Mummert, Deceased
Defendant:
Erin Cassinelli
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Fiduciary Duty
Taylor, et al v. Nichols et al
as 2:2023cv02687
Plaintiff:
Raymond Taylor, DeAngelo Turner and The Estate of Brian Taylor
Defendant:
Jennifer Nichols, Margie Quin, Van Snyder and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Strike 3 Holdings LLC v. DOE
as 2:2023cv02685
Plaintiff:
Strike 3 Holdings LLC
Defendant:
JOHN DOE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1338 Copyright Infringement
Strike 3 Holdings LLC v. DOE
as 2:2023cv02683
Plaintiff:
Strike 3 Holdings LLC
Defendant:
JOHN DOE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1338 Copyright Infringement
Strike 3 Holdings LLC v. DOE
as 2:2023cv02681
Plaintiff:
Strike 3 Holdings LLC
Defendant:
JOHN DOE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1338 Copyright Infringement
Strike 3 Holdings LLC v. DOE
as 2:2023cv02682
Plaintiff:
Strike 3 Holdings LLC
Defendant:
JOHN DOE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1338 Copyright Infringement
Strike 3 Holdings LLC v. DOE
as 2:2023cv02684
Plaintiff:
Strike 3 Holdings LLC
Defendant:
JOHN DOE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1338 Copyright Infringement
Strike 3 Holdings LLC v. John Doe
as 2:2023cv02680
Plaintiff:
Strike 3 Holdings LLC
Defendant:
JOHN DOE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1338 Copyright Infringement
Strike 3 Holdings LLC v. John Doe
as 2:2023cv02678
Plaintiff:
Strike 3 Holdings LLC
Defendant:
John Doe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1338 Copyright Infringement
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
