Cases 41 - 50 of 25,865
Brooks v. Bureau of Prisons
as 2:2024cv02407
Plaintiff:
Unique Brooks
Defendant:
Bureau of Prisons
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Lemm Corporation-Operations v. Capital Industrial Coatings, LLC et al
as 2:2024cv02393
Plaintiff:
Lemm Corporation-Operations
Defendant:
Capital Industrial Coatings, LLC and International Paint, LLC
Vardaman v. Dollar Tree Stores, Inc.
as 2:2024cv02396
Not Yet Classified:
Jamita Swearengen
Plaintiff:
Carolyn Vardaman
Defendant:
Dollar Tree Stores, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
WHEELREPAIRUS, LLC v. TFORCE FREIGHT, INC.
as 2:2024cv02395
Plaintiff:
WHEELREPAIRUS, LLC
Defendant:
TFORCE FREIGHT, INC.
Cause Of Action: 49 U.S.C. § 81 Damaged Goods While Being Transported
United States of America v. Adecco, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv02389
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Ralph Conrad
Garnishee:
Adecco, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345 Recovery of Debt to US
Tillis et al v. Parson et al
as 2:2024cv02392
Plaintiff:
Aluntra R. Tillis and Kevin Brown
Defendant:
Cameran L. Parson and EAN Holdings, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Tort/Motor Vehicle (P.I.)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv02391
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Elnour v. Harrison
as 2:2024cv02394
Petitioner:
Mohamed Elnour
Respondent:
C. Harrison
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Perry v. Vantell
as 2:2024cv02406
Petitioner:
Courtney Perry
Respondent:
Vincent Vantell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Arnold v. Cox et al
as 1:2024cv01122
Plaintiff:
Terrance Arnold, II
Defendant:
Jeremy Cox and Lexington Police Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
