Cases 51 - 60 of 94
Franklin v. Tennessee Department of Correction et al
as 2:2014cv02738
Plaintiff:
Janice Franklin
Defendant:
Mark Luttrell Correctional Center, Corizon, Cynthia Pratt and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
McGee v. United States of America
as 1:2014cv01052
Respondent:
United States of America
Movant:
Franklin Roosevelt McGee
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Hooker-Franklin v. Elvis Presley Enterprises, Inc.
as 2:2013cv03000
Plaintiff:
Elizabeth Hooker-Franklin
Defendant:
Elvis Presley Enterprises, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Hamilton Beach Brands, Inc. v. State Farm Insurance Company et al
as 1:2013cv01293
Plaintiff:
Hamilton Beach Brands, Inc.
Defendant:
State Farm Insurance Company and John Franklin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2013cv02263
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Sex)
United States of America v. Albert Franklin Matthews, III, aka Bert Matthews
as 2:2013cv02017
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Albert Franklin Matthews, III
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345 Recovery of Debt to US
Benson v. Stock et al
as 2:2012cv03092
Plaintiff:
Ronnie J. Benson
Defendant:
Stock, D. Franklin, J. Hargrove and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2012cv02933
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Race)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2012cv02821
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Caery v. Shelby County et al
as 2:2012cv02389
Plaintiff:
Frederick L. Caery
Defendant:
Shelby Co. Dept. of Corr., Minus Adams, Karen Mitchell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
