Cases 1 - 10 of 14
Porterfield v. Shelby County Criminal Justice Center et al
as 2:2021cv02503
Plaintiff:
Issac Porterfield
Defendant:
Shelby County Criminal Justice Center, Dr. O. Webb, Dr. Washington and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
United States of America v. Paragon Bank et al
as 2:2016cv02342
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Garnishee:
Paragon Bank
Defendant:
David J. Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345
Johnson v. Colvin
as 2:2015cv02409
Plaintiff:
Joann J. Johnson
Defendant:
Carolyn W. Colvin
Miscellaneou:
SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1383
Johnson v. Memphis Police Dept. et al
as 2:2014cv02750
Plaintiff:
Timothy Emmanuel Johnson
Defendant:
Memphis Police Dept., J. Johnson, D. Atkins and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
United States of America v. Johnson
as 2:2013cv02683
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
David J. Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345
Johnson v. Cook, Inc. et al
as 2:2012cv02622
Plaintiff:
Alice J. Johnson
Defendant:
Cook, Inc., Cook Biotech, Inc., Cook Medical, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Jeffries v. Shelby County Sheriffs' Department et al
as 2:2012cv02323
Plaintiff:
Jonathan Jeffries
Defendant:
Shelby County Sheriff's Department, Shelby County Jail and J. Johnson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Benson v. Luttrell et al
as 2:2012cv02313
Plaintiff:
Ricky Benson
Defendant:
Mark H. Luttrell, Jr, James E. Coleman, Tonya Beasley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Benson v. State of Tennessee et al
as 2:2012cv02300
Plaintiff:
Ricky Benson
Defendant:
State of Tennessee, Shelby County Government, Mark H. Luttrell, Jr and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Marshall v. Johnson et al
as 2:2012cv02044
Plaintiff:
Cedric Marshall
Defendant:
J. Johnson, Memphis Police Department, Criminal Court Clerk and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
