Cases 1 - 10 of 34
Mathis et al v. American United Life Insurance Company
as 2:2023cv02243
Not Classified By Court:
Gina Gail Smith
Plaintiff:
Zach Mathis and Kristin Mathis
Defendant:
American United Life Insurance Company and The Presley-Taylor Group, LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001 E.R.I.S.A.: Employee Retirement
Mathis et al v. American United Life Insurance Company
as 2:2023cv02242
Plaintiff:
Zach Mathis and Kristen Mathis
Defendant:
American United Life Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001 E.R.I.S.A.: Employee Retirement
Mathis v. Woods et al
as 1:2022cv01180
Plaintiff:
Carlos D. Mathis
Defendant:
Unit Manager Woods, Unit Sgt. Mann, Lt. Gray and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mathis v. United States of America et al
as 2:2022cv02278
Petitioner:
Peter Mathis, Jr.
Respondent:
United States of America and M. Frink
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Dowell v. Kent et al
as 1:2022cv01009
Plaintiff:
Kelvin Dowell
Defendant:
FNU Kent, FNU Bo, Mark Fowler and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mathis v. 101 Travel Center, LLC
as 1:2021cv01174
Plaintiff:
Cynthia Mathis
Defendant:
101 Travel Center, LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Robinson v. Mathis et al
as 2:2020cv02435
Defendant:
Linda Jew Mathis and Golden & Mathis
Plaintiff:
Renee Robinson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Mathis v. United States of America
as 2:2019cv02757
Respondent:
United States of America
Petitioner:
Peter Mathis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Mathis v. United States of America
as 2:2018cv02587
Respondent:
United States of America
Petitioner:
Eureka Roshanda Mathis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Peyton et al v. Monsanto Company et al
as 2:2018cv02332
Plaintiff:
Chris Peyton , Scott Mathias and Peyton & Mathis Farms
Defendant:
Monsanto Company, BASF Corporation, BASF SE and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
