Cases 21 - 30 of 9,375
Freeman v. Director, TDCJ-CID
as 4:2024cv00507
Petitioner:
Russell Scott Freeman
Respondent:
Director, TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Pareja v. Warden
as 5:2024cv00078
Petitioner:
Roberto Alonso Ruiz Pareja
Defendant:
FCI Texarkana Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Gibbs, Jr. v. Warden of FCI Beaumont
as 1:2024cv00210
Petitioner:
Levi Gibbs, Jr.
Respondent:
Director TDCJ
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Garcia v. Lumpkin, Director, TDCJ:
as 6:2024cv00129
Petitioner:
Antonio A Garcia
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin, Director, TDCJ
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Burton v. Director TDCJ
as 1:2024cv00211
Petitioner:
Joshua Mazique Burton
Respondent:
Director TDCJ
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Shockley v. Collin County Detention Facility
as 4:2024cv00508
Petitioner:
Charles Wayne Shockley
Respondent:
Collin County Detention Facility
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 s Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Scott v. Director, TDCJ-CID
as 9:2024cv00074
Petitioner:
Fredrick Fitzgerald Scott, Sr
Respondent:
Director, TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Briggs v. Director, TDCJ-CID
as 4:2024cv00327
Petitioner:
Charles Wade Briggs
Respondent:
Director, TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Briggs v. Director, TDCJ-CID
as 4:2024cv00330
Petitioner:
Charles Wade Briggs
Respondent:
Director, TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Bailey v. Warden, FCI Texarkana
as 5:2024cv00074
Petitioner:
James Robert Bailey
Respondent:
Warden, FCI Texarkana
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
