Cases 1 - 6 of 6
United States of America v. $326,800.00 in United States currency et al
as 4:2017cv00491
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
$326,800.00 in United States currency, $13,773.09 from Bank of America account x1630, $11,100.00 from J.P. Morgan Chase account x1747 and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345
United States of America v. $4,289,628.78 in TD Ameritrade account number x0473 et al
as 4:2017cv00478
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
$4,289,628.78 in TD Ameritrade account number x0473, $2,455,012.06 in TD Ameritrade account number x5643, $507,151.91 in TD Ameritrade account number x9191 and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345
United States of America v. One Rolex Watch et al
as 4:2017cv00052
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
One Rolex Watch, One Gold Belex Watch, Two Cartier Watches and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345
United States of America v. $5, 326.00 in U.S. Currency et al
as 4:2015cv00843
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
$5, 326.00 in U.S. Currency, John Deere Tractor with Loader and Mower, VIN #PY5303U007291, Club Car Golf Cart, VIN #PH1208263429 and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345
United States of America v. $33,600 in United States Currency et al
as 4:2014cv00106
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
$33,600 in United States Currency, eMachines laptop computer, serial number LXN65020709512478D1601, 100 one-ounce silver coins and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345
United States of America v. $52,212.62 seized from Pavillion Bank Acct. No. 61200 et al
as 4:2008cv00384
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
$52,212.62 seized from Pavillion Bank Acct. No. 61200, $36,223.18 seized from Pavillion Bank Acct. No. 58727, $4,256.83 seized from Pavillion Bank Acct. No. 60780 and others
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Plaintiff
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
