Cases 11 - 20 of 20
Cedar Lane Technologies Inc. v. Charter Communications, Inc.
as 2:2019cv00368
Plaintiff:
Cedar Lane Technologies Inc.
Defendant:
Charter Communications, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
Cedar Lane Technologies Inc. v. Frontier Communications Corporation
as 2:2019cv00369
Plaintiff:
Cedar Lane Technologies Inc.
Defendant:
Frontier Communications Corporation
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
Cedar Lane Technologies Inc. v. Larson Electronics, LLC
as 2:2019cv00276
Plaintiff:
Cedar Lane Technologies Inc.
Defendant:
Larson Electronics, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1126
Cedar Lane Technologies Inc. v. Panasonic Corporation of North America
as 2:2019cv00241
Defendant:
Panasonic Corporation of North America
Plaintiff:
Cedar Lane Technologies Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1126
Kobace LLC v. Lane Bryant, Inc.
as 6:2015cv00943
Plaintiff:
Kobace LLC
Defendant:
Lane Bryant, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
Oberalis LLC v. One Kings Lane Inc.
as 2:2015cv00980
Plaintiff:
Oberalis LLC
Defendant:
One Kings Lane Inc.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
Qommerce Systems, LLC v. One Kings Lane Inc.
as 6:2015cv00186
Plaintiff:
Qommerce Systems, LLC
Defendant:
One Kings Lane Inc.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
eDekka LLC v. One Kings Lane Inc.
as 2:2014cv00276
Plaintiff:
eDekka LLC
Defendant:
One Kings Lane Inc.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
Balthaser Online, Inc. v. Kimberly-Clark Corporation et al
as 2:2009cv00188
Plaintiff:
Balthaser Online, Inc.
Defendant:
Kimberly-Clark Corporation, Swann's Furniture Gallery, L.P., Lane Furniture Industries, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
Balthaser Online, Inc. v. Lane Furniture Industries, Inc.
as 2:2009cv00187
Plaintiff:
Balthaser Online, Inc.
Defendant:
Lane Furniture Industries, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1338 Patent Infringement
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
