Cases 41 - 50 of 5,973
Garrett v. Kroger Texas L.P. et al
as 6:2024cv00071
Plaintiff:
Nakisha Garrett
Defendant:
Kroger Texas L.P. and John Doe Manager
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Hufford v. The Kroger Co.
as 4:2024cv00343
Defendant:
The Kroger Co and Kroger
Plaintiff:
Carol Hufford
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Dryden v. Corbett et al
as 2:2024cv00274
Plaintiff:
Sherrie Dryden
Defendant:
Aaron John Corbett and Nomad Building Services d/b/a Australian Outback Buffalo Safari's
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Tort/Motor Vehicle (P.I.)
Bocanegra v. Ross Stores, Inc.
as 4:2024cv00345
Plaintiff:
Maria Ofelia Bocanegra
Defendant:
Ross Stores, Inc. d/b/a dd's Discounts
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Clark v. RaceTrac, Inc.
as 4:2024cv00341
Plaintiff:
Mark Anthony Clark, Jr.
Defendant:
RaceTrac, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Petition for Removal
DOBECKA v. TRACTOR SUPPLY COMPANY
as 6:2024cv00143
Plaintiff:
JAMES DOBECKA
Defendant:
TRACTOR SUPPLY COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Doe (M.K.) v. G6 HOSPITALITY, LLC et al
as 9:2024cv00080
Plaintiff:
Jane Doe (M.K.)
Defendant:
G6 HOSPITALITY, LLC, G6 Hospitality IP, LLC, G6 Hospitality Property, L.L.C. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Personal Injury
Sanford v. AT&T
as 2:2024cv00261
Plaintiff:
Mary Loechel Sanford
Defendant:
AT&T
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Bonsall v. Osmose Untilities Services, Inc., et al
as 1:2024cv00087
Plaintiff:
MADISON LEXIS BONSALL
Defendant:
COLLIN BENOIT, OSMOSE UTILITIES SERVICES, INC. and Junius Benoit
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
Gavin v. Makine
as 4:2024cv00154
Plaintiff:
Patrick Gavin
Defendant:
Erkur Makine
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
