Cases 61 - 70 of 608
Carlock et al v. Goldwater Bank, N.A.
as 9:2022cv00174
Plaintiff:
Matthew Carlock and Lisa Carlock
Defendant:
Goldwater Bank, N.A.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
Philadelphia Indemnity Insurance Company v. L.C. Jordan & Son et al
as 9:2022cv00160
Plaintiff:
Philadelphia Indemnity Insurance Company
Defendant:
L.C. Jordan & Son and Texas State Bank
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
Mangram et al v. USA
as 4:2022cv00876
Plaintiff:
Anthony Mangram and Kindll Williams
Defendant:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Thomas v. USA
as 4:2022cv00872
Plaintiff:
Tamara Thomas
Defendant:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
7X Cattle Company LLC v. Brandstadt
as 6:2022cv00396
Plaintiff:
7X Cattle Company LLC
Defendant:
Daniel Brandstadt
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Property Damage
Estrello v. USA
as 4:2022cv00765
Plaintiff:
James Estrello
Defendant:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Limbaugh v. USA
as 4:2022cv00719
Plaintiff:
Stephen Glen Limbaugh
Defendant:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Boss Exotics LLC v. Best Enclosed LLC et al
as 4:2022cv00717
Plaintiff:
Boss Exotics LLC
Defendant:
Best Enclosed LLC, Pavel Banari, Progressive Casualty Insurance Company and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Interstate Commerce Act
Ogle v. Home Depot U.S.A., Inc.
as 4:2022cv00549
Plaintiff:
James Ogle
Defendant:
Home Depot U.S.A., Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Property Damage
Daughtry et al v. SILVER FERN CHEMICAL, INC et al
as 1:2022cv00239
Plaintiff:
Jake Ellis Daughtry, Sandra Miller Daughtry Individually and doing business as Jake's Fireworks, Joseph Ellis Daughtry and others
Defendant:
Silver Fern Chemical, Inc., Sam King, Timothy Lyons and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
