Cases 81 - 90 of 605
Sparrow et al v. EK Real Estate Services of NY, LLC et al
as 4:2022cv00046
Plaintiff:
Chrysa Sparrow and Kevin Sparrow
Defendant:
EK Real Estate Services of NY, LLC, EasyKnock, Inc and LendingOne, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1601
Diamond et al v. Keaton et al
as 6:2022cv00045
Plaintiff:
Kathryn H Diamond and Michael B. Harvey
Defendant:
Frances L Keaton and Gary E Keaton
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Fiduciary Duty
Forest Investment Associates L.P. v. Thompson et al
as 5:2019cv00065
Plaintiff:
Forest Investment Associates L.P.
Defendant:
James Thompson, April Thompson, James Thompson Trucking, LLC and others
Receiver:
Randy Moore
Interpleader:
BMO Harris Bank N.A.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
Ping An Fund I, L.P. v. Ping An Financial Services, PTE, LLC et al
as 4:2022cv00006
Plaintiff:
Ping An Fund I, L.P.
Defendant:
Ping An Financial Services, PTE, LLC, Frank Smith, Wells Fargo Clearing Services, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
Gatson v. Wilshire Commercial Capital L.L.C. et al
as 4:2022cv00011
Plaintiff:
Rodney Gatson
Defendant:
Wilshire Commercial Capital L.L.C. doing business as Westlake Financial Services, AutoNation Chrysler Dodge Jeep Ram North Richland Hills and Quality Recovery Service Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1601 Truth in Lending
Lin v. USA
as 4:2022cv00050
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
BingLi Lin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Chen v. USA
as 4:2022cv00129
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Chuangui Chen
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Lin v. USA
as 4:2022cv00051
Plaintiff:
BingLi Lin
Defendant:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Chen v. USA
as 4:2022cv00130
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Joanna Chen
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Lin v. USA
as 4:2022cv00055
Plaintiff:
BingLi Lin
Defendant:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
