Cases 131 - 140 of 22,898
Farmer v. Lumpkin
as 1:2024cv00139
Petitioner:
Charles M Farmer
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Stevenson v. Director, TDCJ-CID
as 6:2024cv00132
Petitioner:
Jeremiah Stevenson
Respondent:
Director, TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Stokes v. Neal et al
as 5:2024cv00051
Plaintiff:
Cory Lee Stokes
Defendant:
Jeffrey Neal and Correctional Officer FNU Johnson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Washington v. Bi-State Correctional Center
as 5:2024cv00052
Plaintiff:
Carlisle Washington
Defendant:
Bi-State Correctional Center
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Binion v. Pod Moving & Storage et al
as 4:2024cv00313
Plaintiff:
Seth Binion
Defendant:
Pods Moving & Storage, McKinney P.D., Collin County Criminal Court and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Garcia v. Lumpkin, Director, TDCJ:
as 6:2024cv00129
Petitioner:
Antonio A Garcia
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin, Director, TDCJ
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Johnson v. U.S. Postal Service
as 6:2024cv00128
Plaintiff:
R Wayne Johnson
Defendant:
U.S. Postal Service
Cause Of Action: 39 U.S.C. § 409 Postal Service
Leandry v. USA
as 4:2024cv00306
Petitioner:
Ismael Leandry
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate/Correct Illegal Sentence
Scott v. Director, TDCJ-CID
as 1:2024cv00133
Petitioner:
Fredrick Fitzgerald Scott, Sr
Respondent:
Director, TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Scott v. Director, TDCJ-CID
as 9:2024cv00074
Petitioner:
Fredrick Fitzgerald Scott, Sr
Respondent:
Director, TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
