Cases 171 - 180 of 186
Johnson v. Fox
as 1:2007cv00566
Petitioner:
Maurice J Johnson
Respondent:
John B Fox
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Houston v. Fox et al
as 1:2007cv00548
Petitioner:
Jacquas V Houston
Respondent:
John B Fox and Federal Bureau of Prisons
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Johnson v. Fox et al
as 1:2007cv00559
Petitioner:
Maurice J Johnson
Respondent:
John B Fox and Federal Bureau of Prisons
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Crumpton v. Fox et al
as 1:2007cv00535
Petitioner:
Michael A Crumpton
Respondent:
John B Fox, Federal Bureau of Prisons and Department of Justice
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Crumpton v. Fox et al
as 1:2007cv00536
Plaintiff:
Michael A Crumpton
Defendant:
John B Fox, F.C.I. Beaumont Texas, Federal Bureau of Prisons and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Hunter v. Fox et al
as 1:2007cv00503
Plaintiff:
Steven M Hunter
Defendant:
John B Fox, G Maldonado, Jr, Harley Lappin and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Judd v. Fox
as 1:2007cv00491
Petitioner:
Keith Russell Judd
Respondent:
John B Fox
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Hunter v. Fox
as 1:2007cv00487
Plaintiff:
Steven M Hunter
Defendant:
John B Fox
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Spotts v. Fox
as 1:2007cv00474
Petitioner:
Kelvin Andre Spotts
Respondent:
John B Fox
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Shelton v. Fox et al
as 1:2007cv00462
Plaintiff:
Monty Shelton
Defendant:
John B Fox, C. Quesenberry, Nancy Bobs and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
