Cases 11 - 20 of 22,851
Polk v. Lumpkin
as 9:2024cv00092
Petitioner:
Mavis Ray Polk
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Dingle v. Port Arthur Police Department
as 1:2024cv00174
Plaintiff:
Marthur L Dingle
Defendant:
Port Arthur Police Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hamilton v. Beaumont Police Department et al
as 1:2024cv00175
Plaintiff:
Marcus Anthony Hamilton
Defendant:
Beaumont Police Department, Jefferson County Sheriff Department and State of Texas
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hamilton v. State of Texas et al
as 1:2024cv00176
Plaintiff:
Marcus Anthony Hamilton
Defendant:
State of Texas, Jefferson County Sheriff Department and Beaumont Police Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hancock v. Fuller
as 4:2024cv00434
Plaintiff:
Anthony Eugene Hancock
Defendant:
Hugh Alexander Fuller
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Kohute v. Adams
as 1:2024cv00172
Plaintiff:
Kevin James Kohute
Defendant:
Lankston Adams
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bell v. Coger et al
as 5:2024cv00069
Plaintiff:
Mark Lyle Bell
Defendant:
Asst. Warden Kamilah Coger, Joy Hughes, Todd Hogan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bello v. USA
as 4:2024cv00435
Petitioner:
Olamide Olatayo Bello
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate/Correct Illegal Sentence
Corrales v. Warden, FCI Beaumont Low
as 1:2024cv00168
Petitioner:
Jose Luis Corrales
Respondent:
Warden, FCI Beaumont Low
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Duarte-Vasquez v. Warden, FCI Beaumont Low
as 1:2024cv00169
Petitioner:
Juan Carlos Duarte-Vasquez
Respondent:
Warden, FCI Beaumont Low
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
