Cases 21 - 30 of 654
Magers v. United States of America
as 6:2022cv00488
Plaintiff:
Steven Eric Magers
Defendant:
United States of America
Respondent:
Director, TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Arellano v. United States of America
as 1:2022cv00485
Plaintiff:
Christopher Louis Arellano
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Kirkendoll v. United States of America
as 1:2022cv00449
Plaintiff:
Bobby B. Kirkendoll
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Wammel v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 4:2022cv00842
Petitioner:
Arthur Franz Wammel
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate/Correct Illegal Sentence
Bailey v. United States of America
as 1:2022cv00408
Plaintiff:
Timothy J. Bailey
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Anderson v. USA
as 4:2022cv00780
Consolidated Plaintiff:
Mark J Lieberman
Petitioner:
Terry Dean Anderson, Jr.
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Johnson v. USP Beaumont Staff et al
as 1:2022cv00313
Plaintiff:
Andre'a Darius Johnson
Defendant:
USP Beaumont Staff, USP Medical Staff and UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Perez v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 2:2022cv00261
Plaintiff:
Edic Luna Perez
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate/Correct Illegal Sentence
Runnels v. United States of America
as 1:2022cv00266
Plaintiff:
Trenton Runnels
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346 Tort Claim
Santos v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 4:2022cv00533
Plaintiff:
John Santos
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
