Cases 21 - 30 of 1,039
Wadell v. Elliott et al
as 9:2023cv00141
Plaintiff:
Tyronne D. Wadell
Defendant:
Melissa Elliott and Julie Smitherman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Williams v. Perryman et al
as 6:2023cv00354
Plaintiff:
Jay Williams
Defendant:
Judge Nancy Perryman, Judge Tony Duncan, Judge Scott McKee and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Glenn v. Director, TDCJ-CID
as 6:2023cv00350
Petitioner:
Coy D. Glenn
Respondent:
Director, TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Hogan v. Director, TDCJ-CID et al
as 6:2023cv00336
Plaintiff:
Danny Hogen and Danny Hogan
Defendant:
Director, TDCJ-CID, Officer Unknown Unknown, Officer Ashton Unknown and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Williams v. Hillhouse et al
as 6:2023cv00298
Defendant:
Chris Tinsley, Derick Choice, Nancy Perryman and others
Plaintiff:
Jay Williams
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Byrd v. Smith et al
as 9:2023cv00099
Plaintiff:
David B Byrd
Respondent:
Adrian D. Smith, Korey A. Baugh, Olushola Akarble and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Washington v. Warden
as 1:2023cv00211
Plaintiff:
Tony Washington, Sr.
Defendant:
Ofc. Sowell, FNU Sowell, FNU Barlett and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hinson v. JCCF Medical Department et al
as 1:2023cv00194
Plaintiff:
Robert D. Hinson
Defendant:
JCCF Medical Department, Kim King and Zena Stephens
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Vanous v. King et al
as 5:2023cv00042
Plaintiff:
John Vanous
Defendant:
Darious D. King, FNU Holmes and FNU Hawkins
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Salas v. Collum et al
as 6:2023cv00147
Plaintiff:
John Salas
Defendant:
Asst Warden Michael A Collum, Lieutenant Shon E McGee, Captain Unknown Purkuski and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
