Cases 21 - 30 of 22,851
Duarte-Vasquez v. Warden, FCI Beaumont Low
as 1:2024cv00169
Petitioner:
Juan Carlos Duarte-Vasquez
Respondent:
Warden, FCI Beaumont Low
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Baker v. Sheriff, Jefferson County
as 1:2024cv00173
Petitioner:
Thomas C. Baker
Respondent:
Sheriff, Jefferson County
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Baker v. Stephens
as 1:2024cv00166
Plaintiff:
Thomas C. Baker
Defendant:
Zena Stephens
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McCoy v. Saunders
as 1:2024cv00105
Plaintiff:
James McCoy
Defendant:
M.D. Frank Saunders
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Johnson v. Smith
as 6:2024cv00096
Petitioner:
Richard James Johnson
Respondent:
Sheriff Larry R Smith
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Frankenfield v. Goodall et al
as 9:2024cv00052
Plaintiff:
Brian C Frankenfield
Defendant:
FNU Smith, FNU Goodall, TDCJ Parole Division and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bush v. Warden, FCI Beaumont
as 1:2024cv00163
Petitioner:
Frederick Bush
Respondent:
Warden, FCI Beaumont
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Banks v. Warden-FCI Beaumont
as 1:2024cv00161
Petitioner:
Danny Lee Banks
Respondent:
Warden-FCI Beaumont
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Coe v. Coe et al
as 6:2024cv00103
Plaintiff:
Brenton L Coe
Defendant:
Eve Coe, Julia Martinez-New, Warden FNU Cozbi and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Phillips et al v. County Of Smith et al
as 6:2024cv00095
Plaintiff:
Derek-Lee Phillips and Cody-Storm Voss
Respondent:
County of Smith, Johnathan Peters, Riley Rugg and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
