Cases 31 - 40 of 49
Boothe v. Campbell
as 6:2013cv00524
Petitioner:
Charles Lee Boothe
Respondent:
J. Campbell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Levingston v. Kimborough et al
as 1:2013cv00110
Plaintiff:
Christopher Alan Levingston
Defendant:
John D Kimborough, Mike White, Linda Gore and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Boothe v. Campbell et al
as 6:2013cv00190
Plaintiff:
Charles Lee Boothe
Defendant:
James Campbell, Michael Lindsey, Robin Parsons and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Nordyke v. Director, TDCJ-CID
as 6:2013cv00097
Respondent:
Director, TDCJ-CID
Petitioner:
Robert Campbell Nordyke
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Perry v. Cerliano et al
as 6:2012cv00354
Plaintiff:
Michael Dean Perry
Defendant:
Maxey Cerliano, William Jennings, Dr Lewis Brown and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Williams v. Bowie County Correctional Center Sheriff Prince et al
as 5:2012cv00020
Plaintiff:
Brian J Williams
Defendant:
Bowie County Correctional Center Sheriff Prince, Bowie County Correctional Center Medical Department, FNU Campbell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gipson v. Prince et al
as 5:2012cv00004
Plaintiff:
Danny Joe Gipson
Defendant:
James Prince, FNU Campbell, FNU Johnson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Campbell v. Thaler et al
as 6:2011cv00396
Plaintiff:
Daniel P Campbell
Defendant:
Rick Thaler, Ralph Bales, Chuck Biscoe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Taylor v. Campbell et al
as 6:2011cv00213
Plaintiff:
Canareon Taylor
Defendant:
James Campbell, Michael Lindsey and Robin Parsons
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Abdullah v. Talley et al
as 5:2011cv00001
Plaintiff:
Zakee Kaleem Abdullah
Defendant:
Nancy Talley, James Prince, S Campbell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
