Cases 41 - 50 of 54
Lopez v. Seagroves et al
as 9:2010cv00010
Plaintiff:
Felipe D. Lopez
Defendant:
Unidentified Seagroves, Unidentified Ramirez, Unidentified Currie and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Digges v. Helm et al
as 9:2009cv00201
Plaintiff:
Frank Digges
Defendant:
Frank Helm, Gary Currie, Marcus Glenn and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Okpala v. Lappin et al
as 1:2009cv00828
Plaintiff:
Okey Garry Okpala
Defendant:
Harley Lappin, John B. Fox, Constanle Reese and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Wiley vs Currie, et al
as 9:2008cv00223
Plaintiff:
Willis Floyd Wiley
Defendant:
Gary Currie, Unidentified Bentley, Jennifer Shackel Ford and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Newby v. Cunningham et al
as 9:2008cv00148
Plaintiff:
Rob L. Newby
Defendant:
James R Cunningham, Gary Curry, Vickie Barrow and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Stults vs Currie, et al
as 9:2008cv00135
Plaintiff:
Michael Glenn Stults
Defendant:
Gary L Currie, Adam W Little and Gerard C Johnson
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Parker v. Currie et al
as 9:2008cv00016
Plaintiff:
Clyde Joe Parker, II
Defendant:
Unidentified Currie, Unidentified Smith, Unidentified Shackleford and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lopez v. Wigly et al
as 9:2007cv00308
Plaintiff:
Felipe De Jesus Lopez
Defendant:
D. Wigly, unidentified Moore, Unknown Currie and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Smith v. TDCJ-CID et al
as 9:2007cv00299
Plaintiff:
Edward D. Smith
Defendant:
TDCJ-CID, Kevin Mayfield, Gregory Dawson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Carter v. Dawson et al
as 9:2007cv00219
Plaintiff:
Van Carter
Defendant:
G . Dawson, G. Currie, Unidentifed. Carter and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
