Cases 81 - 90 of 93
Bryant v. Director TDCJ-ID
as 4:2009cv00296
Petitioner:
Jeffrey Michael Bryant
Respondent:
Director TDCJ-ID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Guajardo et al v. Texas Department of Criminal Justice et al
as 1:2009cv00461
Plaintiff:
Hector Guajardo, Martin Sanchez, Michael Bryant and others
Defendant:
Texas Department of Criminal Justice and Reginald Goings
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bryant v. Goings et al
as 1:2009cv00434
Plaintiff:
Rufus Bryant
Defendant:
Reginald Goings and Brad Livingston
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hughes v. Bryant et al
as 9:2009cv00090
Plaintiff:
Mark Hughes
Defendant:
Stephen Bryant, Joe Smith, Timothy Lester and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Garcia et al v. Goings et al
as 1:2009cv00337
Plaintiff:
Alfred Garcia, Cornelius Alix, Anthony J Boyd and others
Defendant:
Reginald Goings, Brian Rodeen and Brad Livingston
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bryant v. Director, TDCJ-CID
as 4:2009cv00192
Petitioner:
Jeffrey Michael Bryant
Defendant:
Director, TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Bryant v. Jackson et al
as 1:2009cv00140
Plaintiff:
Richard Lee Bryant
Defendant:
UP Jackson, UP Johnson, UP Yeruna and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Henderson v. Alford et al
as 1:2008cv00738
Defendant:
FNU Alford, Richard P LeBlanc Unit Admin, Nathanial Quartermann and others
Plaintiff:
Bryant Henderson
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Bryant v. Director, TDCJ-CID
as 2:2008cv00212
Petitioner:
Everett Mark Bryant
Defendant:
Director, TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Hawkins v. Alford et al
as 9:2008cv00008
Plaintiff:
James Hawkins, Jr
Defendant:
Richard K Alford, Billy D Hirsch, Bradley K Hutchison and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
