Cases 1 - 10 of 97
Coe v. Coe et al
as 6:2024cv00103
Plaintiff:
Brenton L Coe
Defendant:
Eve Coe, Julia Martinez-New, Warden FNU Cozbi and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gonzalez v. Director, TDCJ-CID
as 9:2023cv00085
Petitioner:
Jose De Jesus Gonzalez
Respondent:
Director, TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Gonzalez v. Baugh et al
as 9:2022cv00092
Plaintiff:
Michael A Gonzalez
Defendant:
Korie A Baugh, Christopher A Farrell, Penelope Dorson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Frausto-Gonzalez v. Salmonson
as 5:2022cv00047
Petitioner:
Luis Alberto Frausto-Gonzalez
Respondent:
Warden S. Salmonson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Gonzalez v. Stanberry
as 4:2022cv00265
Plaintiff:
Raul Gonzalez
Defendant:
Teri Stanberry
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gonzalez v. Gonzalez et al
as 6:2022cv00017
Plaintiff:
Raul Gonzalez
Defendant:
Sergeant Raquel Gonzalez, Captain Trahan and Sergeant Pollard
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gonzalez v. Warden, FCI Beaumont Low
as 1:2021cv00585
Petitioner:
George Gonzalez
Respondent:
Warden, FCI Beaumont Low
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Gonzalez v. Director TDCJ-CID
as 5:2021cv00134
Petitioner:
Jacob Arnold Gonzalez
Respondent:
Director TDCJ - CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Taylor v. Smith
as 6:2021cv00352
Plaintiff:
David Bruce Taylor, Martin Gonzalez, Jr, Quintraveon Minter and others
Defendant:
Larry Smith
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gonzalez v. Texas Department of Criminal Justice et al
as 6:2021cv00351
Plaintiff:
Jose Gonzalez
Respondent:
Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Bobby Lumpkin, James Bowman and others
Defendant:
Christopher Jaynes, Cecil Hastings and Patrick Shumate
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
