Cases 1 - 10 of 210
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00469
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Kohute v. Adams
as 1:2024cv00172
Plaintiff:
Kevin James Kohute
Defendant:
Lankston Adams
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Boswell v. Huntsville Parole et al
as 6:2024cv00164
Plaintiff:
John A. Boswell
Defendant:
Huntsville Parole, Carmella Jones, Michael Adams and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Prescott (PS) v. Hicks et al
as 6:2024cv00058
Plaintiff:
Anthony Prescott
Defendant:
Tiara Hicks, Debora A. Adams, Andrew C. Brazeal and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Tello v. USA
as 9:2024cv00026
Petitioner:
Adam Tello
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate/Correct Illegal Sentence
Miller v. State Of Texas et al
as 9:2024cv00029
Plaintiff:
Dalton Grant Miller
Defendant:
State Of Texas, Kevin W. Windham, John Price and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Miller v. State Of Texas et al
as 9:2024cv00009
Plaintiff:
Dalton Grant Miller
Defendant:
State Of Texas, Kevin W. Windham, John Price and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wedgeworth v. Collier et al
as 6:2023cv00569
Plaintiff:
James Scott Wedgeworth
Defendant:
Bryan Collier, Warden Jimmy Smith, Warden Henry Adams and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Adams et al v. Payne et al
as 1:2023cv00389
Plaintiff:
Joe Daniel Adams, Christopher Scot Taylor, David Allen Jones and others
Defendant:
James Payne, Karren Price, LeAnn Rafferty and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Adams v. Director, TDCJ-CID
as 4:2023cv01059
Petitioner:
Darnell Iven Adams
Respondent:
Marsha McLane and Director, TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
