Cases 1 - 10 of 23
Roark v. Individuals of the Federal Bureau of Prisons, former and current et al
as 5:2012cv00060
Plaintiff:
Benjamin A Roark
Defendant:
Individuals of the Federal Bureau of Prisons, former and current, Eric Holder, Alberto Gonzales and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
SMITH v. GONZALES et al
as 1:2008cv00634
Petitioner:
RENARD DEWAYNE SMITH
Respondent:
Alberto Gonzales, Harley Lappin and Francisco Quintana
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Van v. Gonzales et al
as 9:2008cv00078
Petitioner:
Nguyen Tuan Van
Respondent:
Alberto Gonzales, Michael Chertoff, Marcy Foreman and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Tran v. Gonzales et al
as 9:2008cv00067
Petitioner:
Son Thanh Tran
Respondent:
Alberto Gonzales, Michael Chertoff, Marcy Forman and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Martin v. Gonzales et al
as 6:2008cv00125
Petitioner:
Anthony . Brian Martin
Respondent:
Alberto Gonzales and Harley Lappin
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Martin v. Gonzales et al
as 1:2008cv00198
Petitioner:
Anthony . Brian Martin
Respondent:
Alberto Gonzales and Harley Lappin
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Jones v. Gonzales et al
as 1:2008cv00014
Plaintiff:
Kacey D Jones
Defendant:
Alberto Gonzales, Harley Lappin and Department of Justice
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wallace v. Gonzales et al
as 6:2008cv00003
Petitioner:
Joel Lee Wallace
Respondent:
Alberto Gonzales and Harley Lappin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Wallace v. Gonzales et al
as 1:2008cv00001
Petitioner:
Joel Lee Wallace
Respondent:
Alberto Gonzales and Harley Lappin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Valliere v. Gonzales et al
as 1:2007cv00829
Petitioner:
Demond S. Valliere
Respondent:
Alberto Gonzales and Harley Lappin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
