Cases 1 - 10 of 32
Stokes v. Neal et al
as 5:2024cv00051
Plaintiff:
Cory Lee Stokes
Defendant:
Jeffrey Neal and Correctional Officer FNU Johnson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jackson-Grant v. USA
as 4:2023cv00866
Petitioner:
Corie Jackson-Grant
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate/Correct Illegal Sentence
Cato v. Pedro et al
as 6:2023cv00448
Plaintiff:
Henry Cato, Jr.
Defendant:
O. Pedro, Cori Brown and Kelli J. McNeil
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gaffney v. Collier et al
as 6:2023cv00319
Plaintiff:
Paul Sean Gaffney
Defendant:
Bryan Collier, April Zamora, Eric Pichardo and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Johnson et al v. Pope et al
as 6:2023cv00199
Plaintiff:
Donald Ray Johnson, Jr., Frederick Osbey, Brandon Thomas and others
Defendant:
Warden Juaquine E Pope, Warden II Juan Garcia, Asst Warden John R. Delapp, Jr. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Pursley v. Warden, FCI Texarkana
as 5:2022cv00066
Petitioner:
Samuel Cory Pursley
Respondent:
Warden, Joe Corley Detention Facility
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Pursley v. Warden, FCI Texarkana
as 9:2022cv00083
Petitioner:
Samuel Cory Pursley
Respondent:
Warden, Joe Corley Detention Facility
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Jacobs v. Bureau Of Prisons
as 1:2022cv00180
Plaintiff:
Cory Jacobs
Defendant:
Bureau Of Prisons
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Satterwhite v. Director, TDCJ-CID
as 9:2022cv00067
Petitioner:
Cory Satterwhite
Respondent:
Director, TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Moore v. Lyons et al
as 9:2021cv00299
Plaintiff:
Bart Thomas Moore
Defendant:
Byron Lyons, Jamie Richardson, Kayce Jones and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
