Cases 1 - 10 of 54
Prescott (PS) v. Hicks et al
as 6:2024cv00058
Plaintiff:
Anthony Prescott
Defendant:
Tiara Hicks, Debora A. Adams, Andrew C. Brazeal and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lampkin v. Cox et al
as 6:2023cv00401
Plaintiff:
Esaw Lampkin
Defendant:
Dannal Cox, R.S. Simmons, Ann Q. Thompson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gross v. Cox et al
as 1:2023cv00279
Plaintiff:
Reginald L. Gross
Defendant:
Stephen J. Cox, Michelle S. Englade, Johnathan Clay Lee and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Lampkin v. Cox
as 6:2023cv00174
Petitioner:
Esaw Lampkin
Respondent:
State of Texas ADA Daniel Cox
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Lampkin v. Perrini et al
as 6:2023cv00108
Plaintiff:
Esaw Lampkin
Defendant:
Chief P.D. Officer Jason Perrini, P.D. Officer FNU Batman, Ann Q. Thompson and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Jaramillo v. Texas, TDCJ-CID et al
as 6:2021cv00253
Defendant:
Officer Okeshia L. Waters, Assistant Warden Darron Lane, Sergeant Charles A. Halem and others
Plaintiff:
Luis Ray Jaramillo, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rutherford v. Rich et al
as 4:2020cv00678
Defendant:
Ed Drain, Jeff Rich, Marisa J Miller and others
Plaintiff:
Bruce Allen Rutherford
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cox v. Warden, USP Beaumont
as 1:2020cv00259
Respondent:
Warden, USP Beaumont
Petitioner:
Patrick Cox
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Peucker v. Catoe et al
as 6:2020cv00025
Defendant:
Deborah Roden, Annie Ivy, Rebecca Cox and others
Plaintiff:
Ryan Andrew Peucker
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cox v. Warden FCC Beaumont Low
as 1:2019cv00554
Plaintiff:
Lewellyn Charles Cox, IV
Defendant:
Warden and Warden FCC Beaumont Low
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
