Cases 1 - 10 of 54
Shelton v. Shelton et al
as 6:2023cv00360
Plaintiff:
Donnel J. Shelton
Defendant:
Chief Deputy Sheriff Craig Shelton, Officer Anthony Garza and Dist. Attorney Tonda Curry
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Williams v. Hillhouse et al
as 6:2023cv00301
Plaintiff:
Jay Williams
Defendant:
Botie Hillhouse, Unidentified Deputies, Tony Duncan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Robertson et al v. Collier et al
as 9:2023cv00023
Plaintiff:
Mark Robertson, George Curry, Tony Egbuna Ford and others
Respondent:
Bryan Collier, Bobby Lumpkin and Daniel Dickerson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Curry v. Holcomb
as 9:2023cv00015
Plaintiff:
Chico Nakia Curry
Defendant:
Officer J. Holcomb
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Curry v. Bowman et al
as 6:2022cv00025
Plaintiff:
Chico Nakia Curry
Defendant:
Jimmy O. Bowman, Vernon B. Mitchell, Jr., Janathan E Yancy and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Curry v. Lumpkin-Director TDCJ-CID et al
as 6:2022cv00022
Plaintiff:
Chico Nakia Curry
Defendant:
Director Bobby Lumpkin-Director TDCJ-CID, Laurey Davis, Nicholas W. Hannah and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Brunelle v. Beddingfield et al
as 6:2020cv00199
Defendant:
David Beddingfield, Cynthia Kent, Brett Harris and others
Plaintiff:
Ronald Brunelle
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Curry v. Shumate
as 6:2019cv00594
Plaintiff:
William Elliot Curry, IV
Defendant:
Joe Shumate
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Curry v. Holcomb
as 9:2020cv00025
Defendant:
Officer J. Holcomb
Plaintiff:
Chico Nakia Curry
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hill v. Hall et al
as 9:2019cv00150
Defendant:
Ederya Hall, Racheal Richards and Gary Curry
Plaintiff:
Edward Hill
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
