Cases 1 - 10 of 14
Godwin v. BOP Director et al
as 1:2022cv00388
Plaintiff:
Roger Godwin
Defendant:
BOP Director, Dr. Luis Ramos, FNU Franks and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Godwin v. McLarty et al
as 1:2022cv00392
Plaintiff:
Roger Godwin
Defendant:
FNU McLarty, BOP Director and Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Ubah v. Denton County Jail et al
as 4:2022cv00636
Plaintiff:
Godwin Ike Ubah
Defendant:
Denton County Jail, Tracy Murphree and Denton County Health Care
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Sutter v. Garland et al
as 5:2022cv00008
Plaintiff:
Shawn Louis Sutter
Defendant:
Merrick B. Garland, Michael Carvajal, Warden S. Salmonson and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Anderson v. Walter et al
as 5:2014cv00131
Plaintiff:
Ruben Solis Anderson
Defendant:
FNU Walter, G.I. Department, FNU Oakes and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Anderson v. Gooden et al
as 5:2014cv00057
Plaintiff:
Ruben Solis Anderson
Defendant:
F Gooden, FNU Foster, FNU Presnell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Davis v. Texas Department of Criminal Justice et al
as 4:2012cv00765
Plaintiff:
James R. Davis
Defendant:
Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Corrections Corporation of America, D. Godwin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Godwin v. Director, TDCJ-CID
as 4:2011cv00259
Petitioner:
Joseph A. Godwin
Defendant:
Director, TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Moore v. Grounds et al
as 5:2010cv00226
Plaintiff:
David T Moore
Defendant:
Dawn Grounds, Jeffrey Caffee, Robert Reed and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Perry v. Kirkpatrick et al
as 5:2009cv00134
Plaintiff:
Rayford F Perry
Defendant:
Pamela Kirkpatrick, Tennie Griffin, Wesley Pratt and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
