Cases 1 - 10 of 30
Glaspie v. Flory et al
as 4:2024cv00150
Plaintiff:
Kevin Neal Glaspie
Defendant:
Craig Flory, S Sprabery, FNU Graham and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mullins v. Graham et al
as 4:2023cv00881
Plaintiff:
Sharda L. Mullins
Defendant:
C. Graham, B Caver, S. Sprabary and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Lee v. Neal et al
as 1:2023cv00150
Plaintiff:
Anderson Lee, Jr
Defendant:
Rockella L. Neal, Jasmine L Graham and Deanda Y Turk
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jaramillo v. Tovar et al
as 6:2023cv00166
Plaintiff:
Luis Ray Jaramillo, Jr.
Defendant:
Asst. Warden Joe Tovar, Sergeant Lucia Villegas, Major Jaime A. Villegas and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bowen v. Denton County Jail
as 4:2023cv00003
Plaintiff:
Bradley Bowen
Defendant:
Denton County Jail, State of Texas, Denton County Texas and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Schroeder v. DHHS Executive Director et al
as 4:2022cv00637
Plaintiff:
Christopher Schroeder
Defendant:
DHHS Executive Director, Dr. Kelly R. Goodness, Flint David Schneider and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gray v. Henderson Police Department et al.
as 6:2022cv00071
Plaintiff:
Terry D Gray, Sr
Respondent:
Henderson Police Department, Lt. Brian Graham and K. Handy
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Graham v. Dobbs et al
as 1:2021cv00378
Plaintiff:
Anthony Graham
Respondent:
FNU Dobbs, Well Path Medical Corp. and Federal Bureau of Prisons
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Graham v. Dobbs et al
as 1:2021cv00377
Plaintiff:
Anthony Graham
Respondent:
FNU Dobbs, Well Path Medical Corp. and Federal Bureau of Prisons
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Vincent v. Gibson et al
as 9:2021cv00037
Defendant:
Anitra Lindley, Matthew Ruble, Robert J Posvar and others
Plaintiff:
Gary Vincent
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
