Cases 1 - 10 of 162
Garrison v. John Does and Janes Does Mark W. Michael Unit
as 6:2024cv00192
Plaintiff:
Curtis Allen Garrison
Defendant:
John Does and Janes Does Mark W. Michael Unit
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Garrison v. John Does and Janes Does, Coffield Unit
as 6:2024cv00193
Plaintiff:
Curtis Allen Garrison
Defendant:
John Does and Janes Does, Coffield Unit
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Pickett v. Doe et al
as 1:2024cv00191
Plaintiff:
Freddie Monroe Pickett
Defendant:
John Doe, Jane Doe and Securus Technologies
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Pickett v. Doe et al
as 1:2024cv00190
Plaintiff:
Freddie Monroe Pickett
Defendant:
John Doe, Jane Doe and Securus Technologies
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Pickett v. Doe et al
as 1:2024cv00192
Plaintiff:
Freddie Monroe Pickett
Defendant:
John Doe, Jane Doe and Securus Technologies
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hancock v. Doe et al
as 4:2024cv00319
Plaintiff:
Anthony E. Hancock
Defendant:
John/Jane Doe, FNU Mr. King, John Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Pickett v. Doe et al
as 1:2024cv00137
Plaintiff:
Freddie Monroe Pickett
Defendant:
John Doe, Jane Doe and Securus Technologies
Petitioner:
John W. Banos
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hancock v. Doe et al
as 4:2024cv00250
Plaintiff:
Anthony E Hancock
Defendant:
John/Jane Doe, FNU LNU, FNU Rodwag and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hancock v. Sheriff Skinner et al
as 4:2024cv00252
Plaintiff:
Anthony E Hancock
Defendant:
John Doe, Jane Doe, FNU Arrant and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hancock v. Doe et al
as 4:2024cv00230
Plaintiff:
Anthony E Hancock
Defendant:
John/Jane Doe and Jane Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
