Cases 1 - 10 of 650
Jones v. Director, TDCJ-CID
as 9:2024cv00093
Petitioner:
Hendrick Darnell Jones
Respondent:
Director, TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Stanfield v. Jones et al
as 6:2024cv00172
Plaintiff:
Timothy Stanfield and Randy Jones
Defendant:
Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Brian Collier and Unknown Loosier
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Boswell v. Huntsville Parole et al
as 6:2024cv00164
Plaintiff:
John A. Boswell
Defendant:
Huntsville Parole, Carmella Jones, Michael Adams and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Burke v. Payne et al
as 9:2024cv00064
Plaintiff:
James Alan Burke, Jr.
Defendant:
James Payne, Karren Price, LeAnn Rafferty and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Jones v. Director, TDCJ-CID
as 6:2024cv00070
Petitioner:
Matthew Thomas Jones
Respondent:
Director, TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jackson v. Lumpkin et al
as 5:2024cv00020
Plaintiff:
Reidie James Jackson
Defendant:
Director, TDCJ Bobby Lumpkin, Michael Britt, Paige Temple and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hillman v. Hillman et al
as 9:2024cv00021
Plaintiff:
Danny A. Hillman
Defendant:
Michelle Hillman, Diane Robinson, Sugar Tiffany Johnson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jones v. Johnson et al
as 4:2024cv00065
Plaintiff:
Matthew Jones
Defendant:
FNU Johnson, FNU Tulf, FNU Ranjo and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Partaka v. Johnson et al
as 6:2024cv00031
Plaintiff:
Dennis W Partaka, Jonathan Pendelton, Matthew Jones and others
Defendant:
FNU Johnson, FNU Tulf, FNU Ranjo and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Jones v. Johnson et al
as 6:2024cv00038
Plaintiff:
Matthew Jones
Defendant:
FNU Johnson, FNU Tulf, FNU Ranjo and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
