Cases 1 - 10 of 12
Busby v. Texas Department of Criminal Justice
as 6:2024cv00116
Plaintiff:
Wyatt Busby
Defendant:
Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Houston District System of Texas, Jennifer Meriwether and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McClelland v. Womack et al
as 1:2022cv00576
Plaintiff:
Chester Joseph McClelland
Defendant:
Jacquely Womack, Frank Saunders, Giden Daniel and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Grizzle v. McCollum et al
as 9:2020cv00058
Plaintiff:
Robert Grizzle
Defendant:
Stacie McCollum, Joseph Watt, Jane Doe #1 Nurse and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Grizzle v. Coffman et al
as 9:2020cv00044
Defendant:
Bruce Johnson, Mervin Cleveland, Martha Walker and others
Plaintiff:
Robert Grizzle
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Perez v. Livingston et al
as 9:2019cv00172
Defendant:
Brad Livingston, Warden Kevin Moore, John Doe and others
Plaintiff:
Bobby Perez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Williams v. Williams et al
as 6:2015cv00007
Plaintiff:
Bruce D Williams
Defendant:
Stephen Williams, Amanda Collins, Kevin Wheat and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Williams v. Williams et al
as 6:2014cv00516
Plaintiff:
Bruce D Williams
Defendant:
Stephen Williams, Amanda Collins, Kevin Wheat and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Chicken v. Beef et al
as 1:2013cv09999
Plaintiff:
Paul Chicken
Defendant:
Joe Beef and Sara Slack
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Herrera v. Rodriquez et al
as 1:2013cv00295
Petitioner:
Robert G Herrera
Defendant:
Gisela Sara Rodriquez, Racheal Sara Rodriquez and Yolanda Sara Rodriquez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Johnson v. Groves Police Department et al
as 1:2011cv00090
Plaintiff:
Edwin James Johnson
Defendant:
Groves Police Department, UP Hinton, UP Watson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
