Cases 1 - 10 of 22,851
Hughes v. Captain Gipson et al
as 9:2024cv00094
Plaintiff:
Charles Harold Hughes
Defendant:
Captain Gibson, Sgt Sykes and Office of the Attorney General - Amicus Curiae
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Deases v. Mr. B. Cain et al Case transferred to the Eastern District of Texas, Tyler Division.
as 6:2024cv00180
Plaintiff:
Estevan Deases
Respondent:
Mr. B. Cain and M.T.C.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jones v. Director, TDCJ-CID
as 9:2024cv00093
Petitioner:
Hendrick Darnell Jones
Respondent:
Director, TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Fields v. Neal
as 5:2024cv00070
Plaintiff:
Derrick D. Fields
Defendant:
Jeff Neal
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Williamson v. United States of America
as 1:2024cv00185
Plaintiff:
Richard Williamson
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346 Tort Claim
Dingle v. Sheriff, Jefferson County
as 1:2024cv00184
Petitioner:
Marthur L Dingle
Respondent:
Sheriff, Jefferson County
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
De Mandueno Garcia v. USP Victorville
as 4:2024cv00454
Petitioner:
Felipe De Mandueno Garcia and Carlos Jesus Madueno
Respondent:
USP Victorville
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Alvarez v. Lumpkin et al
as 1:2024cv00180
Plaintiff:
Edwing Ahmed Alvarez
Defendant:
Bobby Lumpkin, Timothy Fitzpatrick, Christopher L Norsworthy and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Alvarez v. Lumpkin et al
as 1:2024cv00181
Plaintiff:
Edwing Ahmed Alvarez
Defendant:
Bobby Lumpkin, Timothy Fitzpatrick, Angela N Chevalier and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Miles v. West
as 1:2024cv00179
Plaintiff:
Douglas Eugene Miles
Defendant:
Raquel West
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
