Cases 111 - 120 of 141
Walker v. Horn et al
as 4:2011cv00273
Plaintiff:
Darryl Ken Walker
Defendant:
Brian Horn, Samy Sanchez and FNU Kane
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sanchez v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Ins. Co.
as 4:2011cv00213
Plaintiff:
Monica Sanchez
Defendant:
State Farm Mutual Automobile Ins. Co.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Sanchez v. Dir, TDCJ
as 5:2010cv00166
Petitioner:
Eduardo Sanchez
Respondent:
Dir, TDCJ
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Stonebridge Life Insurance Company v. Alvarez, Individually and as Representative of the Estate of Rebecca M. Alvarez et al
as 4:2010cv00432
Plaintiff:
Stonebridge Life Insurance Company
Defendant:
Sylvia Alvarez, Individually and as Representative of the Estate of Rebecca M. Alvarez, Melissa Pierson, Rita Alvarez and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Sanchez v. Dir TDCJ
as 5:2010cv00124
Petitioner:
Eduardo Sanchez
Respondent:
Dir TDCJ
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Sanchez v. Goings et al
as 1:2010cv00066
Defendant:
Reginald Goings, Brian Rodeen, Brad Livingston and others
Plaintiff:
Sylvano Sanchez, Jr
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Williams v. Collier et al
as 1:2010cv00028
Plaintiff:
Jerry Don Williams
Defendant:
FNU Collier, Debra Harrell, Falicia Davis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lugo v. USA
as 4:2010cv00020
Petitioner:
Sixto Sanchez Lugo
Defendant:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate/Correct Illegal Sentence
Alvarado v. Sanchez et al
as 5:2009cv00193
Plaintiff:
Ralph Alvarado
Defendant:
Gabriel Sanchez, Alice Gover, Lis Gover and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hernandez et al v. Autoliv, ASP, Inc.
as 4:2009cv00610
Plaintiff:
Juan Sanchez Hernandez and Graciela Hernandez
Defendant:
Autoliv, ASP, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Motor Vehicle Product Liability
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
