Cases 11 - 20 of 70
Bell v. Dobbs et al
as 1:2023cv00096
Plaintiff:
Joel Bell
Defendant:
Bryan Dobbs, J Bartlett, FNU Parks and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Maida v. Dobbs et al
as 1:2023cv00097
Plaintiff:
Nicholas Maida
Defendant:
Bryan Dobbs, J Bartlett, FNU Parks and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Powell v. Dobbs et al
as 1:2023cv00095
Plaintiff:
Phillip Ray Powell
Defendant:
Bryan Dobbs, J Bartlett, FNU Parks and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Cook v. Dobbs et al
as 1:2023cv00094
Plaintiff:
Armando Cook
Defendant:
Bryan Dobbs, J Bartlett, FNU Parks and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Heath v. Germbino et al
as 2:2023cv00043
Plaintiff:
Secial Heath
Defendant:
Jason Germbino, David Davidison, Mike Davidson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Reid v. Dobbs
as 1:2023cv00032
Plaintiff:
Lesford Mark Reid
Defendant:
Bryan K Dobbs, Unknown Bartlett, Unknown Rhodes and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Rodriguez, Jr. v. Texas Department of Correctional Justice
as 9:2018cv00176
Defendant:
Steven Edwards, Michael Davis, Donald Patrick and others
Plaintiff:
Frank W Rodriguez, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Houston v. Heath et al
as 9:2023cv00005
Plaintiff:
Donte Houston
Defendant:
Joseph Heath and Unknown Dom
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Reid v. Dobbs
as 9:2023cv00013
Plaintiff:
Lesford Mark Reid
Defendant:
Bryan K Dobbs, Unknown Bartlett, Unknown Rhodes and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Rogers v. Dobbs et al
as 1:2022cv00444
Plaintiff:
Isom D Rogers, III
Defendant:
Bryan Dobbs, J Bartlett, FNU Parks and others
Petitioner:
Antoine Jackson, DeMariol Byrd, Donte Moore and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
