Cases 11 - 20 of 220
Foster v. Director, TDCJ-CID
as 6:2023cv00543
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Foster
Defendant:
Bryan Collier
Respondent:
Director, TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Smith v. Director, TDCJ-CID
as 4:2023cv00739
Plaintiff:
Bryan A Smith
Defendant:
Bryan Collier and Director, TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Estrada v. Collier et al
as 1:2023cv00252
Petitioner:
Joe Salinas Estrada, Jr.
Respondent:
Bryan Collier, Bobby Lumpkin, Criminal Justice Texas Department and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Gaffney v. Collier et al
as 6:2023cv00319
Plaintiff:
Paul Sean Gaffney
Defendant:
Bryan Collier, April Zamora, Eric Pichardo and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Dittoe v. Collier, et al.
as 4:2023cv00555
Plaintiff:
John Dittoe
Defendant:
Bryan Collier, Sharp Latressin, Thomas R Ashley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Dittoe v. Collier, et al.
as 5:2023cv00060
Plaintiff:
John Dittoe
Defendant:
Bryan Collier, Sharp Latressin, Thomas R Ashley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Pacheco-Morales v. Director, TDCJ-CID
as 4:2023cv00513
Petitioner:
Hector Pacheco-Morales
Respondent:
Bryan Collier
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Chatton v. Back et al
as 1:2023cv00212
Plaintiff:
Tommie Ray Chatton
Defendant:
J. Back, K. Smith, Adeola Bosede and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Evans v. Collier et al
as 1:2023cv00164
Plaintiff:
Ishmael A. Evans
Defendant:
Bryan Collier, Bobby Lumpkin, Christopher Norsworthy and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Dawson v. Rowry et al
as 1:2023cv00156
Plaintiff:
Julius Timothy Dawson
Defendant:
Charles Rowry and Bryan Collier
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
