Cases 11 - 20 of 26
Judd v. Martin et al
as 1:2008cv00174
Petitioner:
Keith Russell Judd
Respondent:
Marques Martin, Federal Correctional Complex Low and Attorney General for the State of New Mexico
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Judd v. United States Court of Appeals
as 1:2008cv00170
Plaintiff:
Keith Russell Judd
Defendant:
United States Court of Appeals
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Judd v. Martin et al
as 1:2008cv00165
Petitioner:
Keith Russell Judd
Respondent:
Marques Martin and Federal Correctional Complex Low
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Judd v. Oboma et al
as 1:2008cv00093
Plaintiff:
Keith Russell Judd
Defendant:
Barack Oboma, John McCain, Hillary Rodham Clinton and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Injunctive & Declaratory Relief
Judd v. Martin et al
as 1:2008cv00083
Petitioner:
Keith Russell Judd
Respondent:
Marqus Martin and Federal Communication Commission
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Judd v. United States of America et al
as 1:2008cv00063
Plaintiff:
Keith Russell Judd
Defendant:
United States of America, Federal Bureau of Prisons, Federal Bureau of Investigation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Judd v. Fox
as 1:2008cv00048
Petitioner:
Keith Russell Judd
Respondent:
John B Fox
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Judd v. Federal Election Commission
as 1:2008cv00004
Plaintiff:
Keith Russell Judd
Defendant:
Federal Election Commission
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Judd v. Fox
as 1:2007cv00951
Petitioner:
Keith Russell Judd
Respondent:
John B Fox
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Judd v. Quintana
as 1:2007cv00926
Petitioner:
Keith Russell Judd
Respondent:
Francisco J Quintana
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
