Cases 21 - 28 of 28
Ali v. Gonzales et al
as 9:2007cv00156
Petitioner:
Mohammad Faisal Ali
Respondent:
Alberto Gonzales, Michael Chertoff and Kenneth Landgrebe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Stangel v. Gonzales et al
as 6:2007cv00292
Plaintiff:
John Albert Stangel
Defendant:
Alberto Gonzales, Direct Trailer Company LP, Texas Department of Criminal Justice and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rangel v. US Citizenship and Immigration Services Dallas District et al
as 4:2007cv00279
Plaintiff:
Juan C Rangel
Defendant:
US Citizenship and Immigration Services Dallas District, US Citizenship and Immigration Services and Alberto Gonzales
Cause Of Action: 8 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Naturalization Hearing
Bhai v. Gonzales et al
as 9:2007cv00107
Plaintiff:
Mehrab Rahim Bhai
Defendant:
Alberto Gonzales, Michael Chertoff and Kenneth Landgreb
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Qureshi v. Gonzales et al
as 9:2007cv00091
Petitioner:
Nasir Wahab Qureshi
Respondent:
Alberto Gonzales, Kenneth Landgreb, Salvador Gonzalez and others
Defendant:
Michael Chertoff
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 s Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Yunus v. Gonzales et al
as 9:2007cv00092
Petitioner:
Suhail Khan Yunus
Respondent:
Alberto Gonzales, Michael Chertoff and Kenneth Landgrebe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 s Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Mir v. Barrows
as 4:2007cv00138
Plaintiff:
Babak Mir
Defendant:
Angela Barrows, Michael Chertoff and Alberto Gonzales
Cause Of Action: 8 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Naturalization Hearing
Farhat v. Barrows et al
as 4:2007cv00038
Plaintiff:
Abbas Farhat
Defendant:
Angela Barrows, Michael Chertoff, Alberto Gonzales and others
Cause Of Action: 8 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Naturalization Hearing
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
