Cases 21 - 30 of 854
Ezenwa v. Warden, SPC Beaumont Camp
as 1:2024cv00107
Petitioner:
Maxwell Chibueze Ezenwa
Respondent:
Warden, SPC Beaumont Camp
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Grammar v. Warden, FCC Coleman Low
as 9:2024cv00054
Petitioner:
Donny Grammar
Respondent:
Warden, FCC Coleman Low
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Coe v. Coe et al
as 6:2024cv00103
Plaintiff:
Brenton L Coe
Defendant:
Eve Coe, Julia Martinez-New, Warden FNU Cozbi and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Shilling v. Warden
as 5:2024cv00039
Petitioner:
Ryan Joel Shilling
Respondent:
FCI Texarkana Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Duke v. Collier et al
as 6:2024cv00085
Plaintiff:
Tim L Duke
Defendant:
Brian Collier and Warden Unknown
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Escobedo v. Warden, TDCJ-CID
as 1:2024cv00092
Petitioner:
Ramiro Escobedo
Respondent:
Warden, TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Escobedo v. Warden, TDCJ-CID
as 9:2024cv00048
Petitioner:
Ramiro Escobedo
Respondent:
Warden, TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Barnes v. Warden, FCI Three Rivers
as 9:2024cv00044
Petitioner:
Nevon Barnes
Defendant:
Warden, FCI Three Rivers
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Mozee v. Goodall et al
as 1:2024cv00072
Plaintiff:
Patrick O'Neal Mozee
Defendant:
Asst. Warden J. Goodall, Major FNU Griggs, Captain FNU Criddle and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Kingston v. Warden
as 5:2024cv00028
Petitioner:
Alexander M. Kingston
Respondent:
FCI Texarkana Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
