Cases 21 - 30 of 331
Washington v. CoreCivic Cimarron Facility
as 5:2023cv00047
Petitioner:
Willie Lewis Washington, Jr.
Respondent:
Warden, CoreCivic Cimarron Facility
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
El Shabazz Bey v. Tang et al
as 4:2023cv00151
Plaintiff:
Mustafa El Shabazz Bey and Noland Roosevelt Byrd
Defendant:
Michael Tang and Greg Willis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Carr v. Kirkland et al
as 2:2023cv00069
Petitioner:
Willie Ty'rone Carr
Respondent:
Michael Kirkland and Craig Fletcher
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Yazdi v. Brouwer et al
as 9:2022cv00165
Plaintiff:
Fred Yazdi
Defendant:
Thomas Brouwer, B. Barnett, Charles C. Hudnall and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
McAllister v. Brouwer et al
as 9:2022cv00164
Plaintiff:
George L. McAllister
Defendant:
Thomas Brouwer, B. Barnett, Charles C. Hudnall and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Tupper v. Brouwer et al
as 9:2022cv00162
Plaintiff:
John Tupper
Defendant:
Thomas Brouwer, B. Barnett, Charles C. Hudnall and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Borden v. Brouwer et al
as 9:2022cv00163
Plaintiff:
Paul W. Borden
Defendant:
Thomas Brouwer, B. Barnett, Charles C. Hudnall and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Hopkins v. Brouwer et al
as 9:2022cv00166
Plaintiff:
Steven Hopkins
Defendant:
Thomas Brouwer, B. Barnett, Charles C. Hudnall and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Fuller v. Brouwer et al
as 9:2022cv00169
Plaintiff:
Donald Fuller
Defendant:
Thomas Brouwer, B. Barnett, Charles C. Hudnall and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Burchfield v. Brouwer et al
as 9:2022cv00168
Plaintiff:
Charles Burchfield
Defendant:
Thomas Brouwer, B. Barnett, Charles C. Hudnall and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
