Cases 31 - 40 of 89
Smith v. Union Pacific Railroad Company et al
as 1:2014cv00477
Plaintiff:
Phalisa Smith
Defendant:
Union Pacific Railroad Company and Rail Service and Logistics, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Taylor v. Union Pacific Railroad Company
as 5:2014cv00012
Defendant:
Union Pacific Railroad Company
Plaintiff:
Danny Ray Taylor
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Frederick v. Union Pacific Railroad Company
as 6:2013cv00971
Plaintiff:
David B Frederick
Defendant:
Union Pacific Railroad Company
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 51
Union Pacific Railroad Company v. Pro Sands Processing, LLC
as 4:2013mc00020
Plaintiff:
Union Pacific Railroad Company
Defendant:
Pro Sands Processing, LLC
Buckley et al v. Union Pacific Railroad Company
as 1:2013cv00022
Plaintiff:
Henry J Buckley , Gilbert A Curtis , Ronald Morale and others
Defendant:
Union Pacific Railroad Company
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 51 Railways: Fed. Employer's Liability Act
Union Pacific Railroad Company v. Alloy Polymers, Inc.
as 9:2012cv00197
Plaintiff:
Union Pacific Railroad Company
Defendant:
Alloy Polymers, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1337 Sherman-Clayton Act
EMG Technology, LLC v. Union Pacific Railroad Company
as 6:2012cv00741
Plaintiff:
EMG Technology, LLC
Defendant:
Union Pacific Railroad Company
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
Hotaling v. The Kansas City Southern Railway Company et al
as 1:2012cv00386
Plaintiff:
Bernard James Hotaling
Defendant:
The Kansas City Southern Railway Company , Union Pacific Corporation , Union Pacific Railroad Company and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Lopez et al v. Union Pacific Railroad Company
as 2:2012cv00410
Plaintiff:
Ivan Lopez and Margarita Lopez
Defendant:
Union Pacific Railroad Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Stoxstell v. Union Pacific Railroad Company
as 6:2012cv00357
Plaintiff:
Marvin Stoxstell
Defendant:
Union Pacific Railroad Company
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 51
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
