Cases 61 - 70 of 102
Secure Axcess L.L.C. v. Ericsson Inc.
as 6:2015cv00211
Plaintiff:
Secure Axcess L.L.C.
Defendant:
Ericsson Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1126
Sycamore IP Holdings LLC v. Ericsson Inc., et al
as 2:2015cv00332
Plaintiff:
Sycamore IP Holdings LLC
Defendant:
Ericsson Inc. and Telefonaktiebolaget LM Ericsson
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
Ericsson Inc. et al v. Apple Inc.
as 2:2015cv00292
Plaintiff:
Ericsson Inc. and Telefonaktiebolaget LM Ericsson
Defendant:
Apple Inc.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
Ericsson Inc. et al v. Apple Inc.
as 2:2015cv00291
Plaintiff:
Ericsson Inc. and Telefonaktiebolaget LM Ericsson
Defendant:
Apple Inc.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
Ericsson Inc. et al v. Apple Inc.
as 2:2015cv00293
Plaintiff:
Ericsson Inc. and Telefonaktiebolaget LM Ericsson
Defendant:
Apple Inc.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
Ericsson Inc. et al v. Apple Inc.
as 2:2015cv00289
Plaintiff:
Ericsson Inc. and Telefonaktiebolaget LM Ericsson
Defendant:
Apple Inc.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
Ericsson Inc. et al v. Apple Inc.
as 2:2015cv00290
Plaintiff:
Ericsson Inc. and Telefonaktiebolaget LM Ericsson
Defendant:
Apple Inc.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
Ericsson Inc. et al v. Apple Inc.
as 2:2015cv00287
Plaintiff:
Ericsson Inc. and Telefonaktiebolaget LM Ericsson
Defendant:
Apple Inc.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
Ericsson Inc. et al v. Apple Inc.
as 2:2015cv00288
Plaintiff:
Ericsson Inc. and Telefonaktiebolaget LM Ericsson
Defendant:
Apple Inc.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
Sycamore IP Holdings LLC v. ABB, Inc. et al
as 2:2015cv00238
Plaintiff:
Sycamore IP Holdings LLC
Defendant:
ABB, Inc, ABB, Inc., PacketLight USA and others
Consolidated Defendant:
Anritsu Instruments Co., ADVA Optical Networking SE, Anritsu Co. and others
Not Classified By Court:
David Folsom and David Keyzer
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
