Cases 1 - 10 of 213
Baker v. Ford Motor Company
as 4:2024cv00768
Plaintiff:
Shane Baker
Defendant:
Ford Motor Company
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2301 Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act
Mallard v. Womack et al
as 9:2024cv00138
Defendant:
FNU Night, FNU Baker, FNU Cruz and others
Plaintiff:
Chansler Depaul Mallard
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Mallard v. Womack et al
as 6:2024cv00269
Defendant:
Spangler Proper, Lewis Mason, Justin Larson and others
Plaintiff:
Chansler Depaul Mallard
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Baker v. MTC et al
as 6:2024cv00238
Defendant:
FNU Sherod, FNU Alexander, TDCJ and others
Plaintiff:
Ajalon Baker
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wolfford v. Ivey et al
as 9:2024cv00113
Defendant:
William Turner, James Hyland, III, Aaron Baker and others
Plaintiff:
Nickolas Wolfford
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Baker v. Sheriff, Jefferson County
as 1:2024cv00193
Petitioner:
Thomas C. Baker
Respondent:
Sheriff, Jefferson County
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Baker v. Liberty Mutual Insurance Company
as 2:2024cv00371
Defendant:
American Fire and Casualty Company and Liberty Mutual Insurance Company
Plaintiff:
James Baker
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract
Baker v. Sheriff, Jefferson County
as 1:2024cv00173
Petitioner:
Thomas C. Baker
Respondent:
Sheriff, Jefferson County
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Baker v. Stephens
as 1:2024cv00166
Plaintiff:
Thomas C. Baker
Defendant:
Zena Stephens
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Baker v. Jefferson County Sheriff
as 1:2024cv00160
Petitioner:
Thomas C. Baker
Respondent:
Director, TDCJ-CID and Jefferson County Sheriff
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 s Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
