Cases 1 - 10 of 68
Aguirre v. Securus Technology et al
as 6:2024cv00141
Plaintiff:
Arnold Aguirre
Defendant:
Securus Technology, Ariel Burks, Unknown Pharr and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Burke v. Director, TDCJ-CID
as 6:2024cv00123
Petitioner:
Andrew Burke
Defendant:
Director, TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Burke v. Director, TDCJ-CID
as 6:2024cv00124
Petitioner:
Andrew Burke
Respondent:
Director, TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Burke v. Director, TDCJ-CID
as 9:2024cv00073
Petitioner:
Andrew Burke
Respondent:
Director, TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Burke v. Director, TDCJ-CID
as 9:2024cv00066
Petitioner:
Andrew Burke
Defendant:
Director, TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Burke v. Payne et al
as 9:2024cv00064
Plaintiff:
James Alan Burke, Jr.
Defendant:
James Payne, Karren Price, LeAnn Rafferty and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Crisp v. Bron & Claude Engineering, LLC et al
as 1:2024cv00048
Plaintiff:
Michael Dail Crisp
Defendant:
Bron & Claude Engineering, LLC and Bronson Burke
Smith v. Collier et al
as 5:2024cv00004
Plaintiff:
Gary Smith
Defendant:
Brian Collier, Warden Michael Feazell, Assistant Warden and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Adams et al v. Payne et al
as 1:2023cv00389
Plaintiff:
Joe Daniel Adams, Christopher Scot Taylor, David Allen Jones and others
Defendant:
James Payne, Karren Price, LeAnn Rafferty and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wolfford v. Polunsky Unit - TDCJ et al
as 9:2023cv00048
Plaintiff:
Nickolas Wolfford
Defendant:
Polunsky Unit - TDCJ, Melisa Elliott, Paul Reilley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
