Cases 1 - 10 of 36
Johnson v. Becton, Dickinson and Company et al
as 4:2023cv00672
Plaintiff:
Scott Johnson
Defendant:
Becton, Dickinson and Company, C.R. Bard, Inc., Bard Access Systems, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Autry v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 1:2019cv00609
Defendant:
Bard Peripheral Vascular, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Terry Autry
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Seidel v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 1:2019cv00610
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc. and Bard Peripheral Vascular, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Christina Marie Seidel
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
GREGER et al v. C.R. Bard, Inc et al
as 4:2019cv00675
Plaintiff:
Misty Greger and Joey Greger
Defendant:
Bard Peripheral Vascular, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391
Capers v. C.R. Bard Inc., et al
as 4:2019cv00660
Defendant:
Bard Peripheral Vascular, Inc. and C.R. Bard Inc.
Plaintiff:
Patricia Capers
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
McMurdy et al v. Boston Scientific Corporation et al
as 2:2019cv00301
Defendant:
Boston Scientific Corporation, Coloplast A/S, Mpathy Medical Devices, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Nina Lee McMurdy and Frederick McMurdy
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Loughridge v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 4:2018cv00525
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Michael Loughridge
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Williams v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 1:2018cv00151
Plaintiff:
Josephene Williams
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Medical Components, Inc. v. C.R. Bard, Inc., et al
as 6:2017cv00237
Plaintiff:
Medical Components, Inc.
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc. , Bard Peripheral Vascular, Inc. and Bard Access Systems, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
Alvarado v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2017cv00112
Plaintiff:
Katrina Alvarado
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
