Cases 1 - 10 of 97
Prescott (PS) v. T.D.C.J Corr. Officers et al
as 6:2024cv00080
Plaintiff:
Anthony Prescott
Defendant:
T.D.C.J Corr. Officers, Jeffery Catoe, Mathew Barber and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Prescott (PS) v. Pruitt et al
as 6:2024cv00079
Plaintiff:
Anthony Prescott
Defendant:
Myron J. Pruitt, Daniel Choate, Homero Garza and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
AML IP, LLC v. The Cato Corporation
as 2:2023cv00602
Plaintiff:
AML IP, LLC
Defendant:
The Cato Corporation
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
Cato v. Pedro et al
as 6:2023cv00448
Plaintiff:
Henry Cato, Jr.
Defendant:
O. Pedro, Cori Brown and Kelli J. McNeil
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hill v. Texas Department of Criminal Justice et al
as 6:2020cv00544
Defendant:
Hightower Unit Medical Department, Coffield Medical Staff, Unknown Catoe and others
Plaintiff:
Rosick Hill
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Grant v. Jackson et al
as 9:2020cv00188
Defendant:
David B Lee, Michael L Herrington, Leroy Jackson and others
Plaintiff:
Joseph Grant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dominguez v. Catoe et al
as 6:2020cv00122
Plaintiff:
Raul Eliss Dominguez
Defendant:
Jeffery W Catoe, Gary Wright and Sondra Sandoval
Amicus Curiae:
Office of the Attorney General as Amicus Curiae
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Prescott v. Catoe et al
as 4:2020cv00169
Defendant:
John Warren, Matthew Barber, Tim Wildman and others
Plaintiff:
Anthony Prescott
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Peucker v. Catoe et al
as 6:2020cv00025
Defendant:
Deborah Roden, Annie Ivy, Rebecca Cox and others
Plaintiff:
Ryan Andrew Peucker
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Adams v. Paxton et al
as 6:2019cv00565
Defendant:
Mark Staples, Charles O Meador, Pennie R Kempt and others
Plaintiff:
Mark D Adams
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
