Cases 1 - 10 of 25
Abdallah v. Samuals, et al
as 5:2014cv00059
Petitioner:
Kamal Abdallah
Respondent:
Charles E. Samuals, M Melton, Harrell Watts and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Moore v. Chitwood et al
as 1:2013cv00532
Petitioner:
Terrance L Moore
Respondent:
B Chitwood, W Wood, Ja Pittman and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Jefferson v. Endsley et al
as 5:2013cv00018
Plaintiff:
Willie Jefferson
Defendant:
D Endsley, D Golden, Robert Smith, . and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Roark v. Individuals of the Federal Bureau of Prisons, former and current et al
as 5:2012cv00060
Plaintiff:
Benjamin A Roark
Defendant:
Individuals of the Federal Bureau of Prisons, former and current, Eric Holder, Alberto Gonzales and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Loftin v. Phillips et al
as 1:2012cv00206
Plaintiff:
Reginald Loftin
Defendant:
Les Phillips, FNU Galindo, FNU Bartlett and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Watkins v. Statcher et al
as 1:2011cv00619
Plaintiff:
Eric Watkins
Defendant:
UP Statcher, Food Service Administrator, Food Service Formans and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Shaw v. Upton et al
as 1:2011cv00429
Plaintiff:
Christopher W Shaw
Defendant:
Jody R Upton, G. Maldonado, Jr., Harrell Watts and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Watkins v. Upton et al
as 1:2011cv00244
Plaintiff:
Eric Watkins
Defendant:
Jody Upton, G. Maldonado, Jr. and Harrell Watts
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Wise v. Lappin et al
as 1:2011cv00148
Plaintiff:
Timothy Scott Wise
Defendant:
Harley G Lappin, G. Maldonado, Jr., Harrell Watts and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mahone v. Adduci et al
as 1:2010cv00693
Plaintiff:
Michael A Mahone
Defendant:
Jon Adduci, G. Maldonado, Jr., Harrell Watts and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
