Cases 1 - 10 of 64
Lappin et al v. Landstar Inway, Inc. et al
as 2:2020cv00093
Plaintiff:
Levi Lappin and Juliegh Lappin
Defendant:
James Adams and Landstar Inway, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Elliott v. United States Department of Justice et al
as 4:2016cv00882
Plaintiff:
Michael Elliott
Defendant:
United States Department of Justice, Loretta Lynch and Harley G Lappin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Roark v. Individuals of the Federal Bureau of Prisons, former and current et al
as 5:2012cv00060
Plaintiff:
Benjamin A Roark
Defendant:
Individuals of the Federal Bureau of Prisons, former and current, Eric Holder, Alberto Gonzales and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Burnett v. Holder et al
as 1:2012cv00102
Petitioner:
Leon Thomas Burnett
Respondent:
Eric H Holder and Harley G Lappin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Murray v. Lappin
as 1:2012cv00093
Petitioner:
Greg Murray
Respondent:
Harley Lappin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Fisher v. Matt et al
as 1:2011cv00492
Plaintiff:
David Lee Fisher
Defendant:
FNU Matt, FNU Flores, FNU Hill and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Baadhio v. Federal Bureau of Prisons et al
as 1:2011cv00276
Plaintiff:
Randy Baadhio
Defendant:
Federal Bureau of Prisons, Harry Lappin, John Fox and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wise v. Lappin et al
as 1:2011cv00148
Plaintiff:
Timothy Scott Wise
Defendant:
Harley G Lappin, G. Maldonado, Jr., Harrell Watts and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Judd v. United States of America et al
as 5:2010cv00240
Plaintiff:
Keith Russell Judd
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Eric Holder, U. S. Attorney General and others
Respondent:
Harley G. Lappin, Federal Bureau of Prisons, U. S. Department of Justice and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mahone v. Adduci et al
as 1:2010cv00693
Plaintiff:
Michael A Mahone
Defendant:
Jon Adduci, G. Maldonado, Jr., Harrell Watts and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
